Draper
folks protest proposed TRAX line
By Amelia Nielson-Stowell
DRAPER — Armed with a petition, residents of this south

More than 200 people crowded the council chambers and overflowed into
the halls Tuesday night, most to speak out against a proposed light-rail line
on the old Union Pacific Railroad tracks.
That line cuts through
neighborhoods, would disturb the Porter Rockwell trail and could decrease
property values. On top of that, there are safety, noise, pollution, ground
vibrations, traffic, lights, environmental impacts — issues that have yet to be
studied, residents said.
"We don't think light rail coming through this Draper
neighborhood makes any sense," said Summer Pugh, a Draper resident who
headed up the petition against the route.
In three days, Pugh garnered almost 800 signatures.
"We're looking at trains running through our
neighborhoods every 15 minutes," she said.
That right-of-way was purchased by UTA in 1993, with the
intention that light rail eventually would be built on the tracks, said G.J. LaBonty, project manager with UTA.
A yearlong study by a panel of UTA, Draper and Wasatch Front
Regional Council officials found that the best alternative for a TRAX line to
the south end of
"One of the factors in this is cost. It's about 15
percent more to build the light rail down
But residents doubt a rail in their back yards will
benefit the community, known for its historic green pastures and newer homes.
Mass transit along
"If you approve it, this council's legacy will not be that you
brought TRAX to Draper, but that you brought TRAX into the neighborhoods,"
resident Steve Decho said.
The project, however, is still far off. At its earliest,
the $250 million development could start in 2015. But money for the line is
still pending on next month's vote for an increase in sales tax. And what
projects in
It isn't likely all the transit projects will be paid for through
the sales tax initiative, however, and as a result the Draper line could be
postponed.
The City Council heard from residents at the public
hearing for nearly two hours Tuesday. They voted to discuss and possibly vote
on the issue again on Nov. 14, after the Nov. 7 elections.